Share this post:

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Active Vs. Passive: Which Is the Superior Real Estate Investment Strategy?

My friend, Joe Fairless who controls over $460,000,000 in multifamily real estate wrote a great article for Forbes defining the difference bewteen active and passive investing. If you are interested in understanding the difference and determining which path is right for you, I suggest you read the full article here.

A major take away from the article is around time commitment and Joe says:

“As an active investor, the advantage of more control comes with the disadvantage of a greater time commitment. It is your responsibility to educate yourself on the ins and outs of single-family rental investing. Then, you have to find and vet various team members. Once you have a team in place, you have to perform all the duties required to find, qualify and close on a deal. After closing, as long as you have a good property management company, it should be pretty hands-off. Although, if (really, when) something unexpected occurs, you’re responsible for making those decisions, which can come with a lot of stress and a lot of headaches.

Of course, it is indeed possible to automate the majority, if not all, of the above tasks. But that requires a certain level of expertise and a large time investment to implement effectively.

Passive investing is more or less hassle-free. You don’t have to worry about any of the actions described above. You just need to initially vet the apartment syndicator and vet the deal. From there, you simply invest your capital and read the monthly or quarterly project updates.”

More to explore